Human condition in objects, situations and the resultant hybrid state of a dialog is how I receive my world. Constantly trying to arrive at the articulation of my enquiry; much of my living reality is informed through the politics of experience.
Materiality of the work, once the last question has been indulged in, becomes an open field. I keep loopingly arriving at this departure.
My art practice is fundamentally concerned with the relationality of an individual body. I view an individual to be constantly in context to, in synchrony and exchange with the immediate and extended environment (natural, built and social), which opens up the landscape of how much an individual and factors in the said environment affect each other. An effort/intervention made, however small, at any point/capacity, has a ripple effect of respective magnitude, in the entire matrix.
Notions of relevance have always guided my choices/strategies; And thus my projects are site specific and nuanced.
Because I situate a person at the center of his social environment (private and public), the inherent order and hierarchies of power structure is acknowledged and negotiated with. The aspects of interactions and performativity in my concerns/work is a deliberate strategy to achieve some degree of agency.
My practice explores the interplay of utilitarian function and interactive art.
My praxis is founded on the framework of the body. The practice assumes the body as a technique, method and a process that is quintessentially fragmented.
Fragmented in time, space, language and experience. Framework of the body suggests all sensorial and experiential phenomena as registered wholly, partially and not.